A7A5 vs Usual USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Peg history unavailable.
Over the last 30 days A7A5 supply moved +18.8% and USD0 -1.0% โ A7A5 grew faster.
| Metric | A7A5 | USD0 |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $544.7M | $542.7M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #19 | #20 |
| Peg | RUB | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | RUB deposits in banks | Tokenized US Treasuries (Usual) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Tron | Ethereum |
| Issuer | โ | Usual |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
A7A5 is RUB-pegged and USD0 tracks USD, so they serve different currency markets and their market caps are not directly comparable. A7A5 holds rub deposits in banks; USD0 holds tokenized us treasuries (usual).
A7A5 is larger, with $544.7M in circulation vs $542.7M for USD0. That's roughly 1.0ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a fiat-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. A7A5 and USD0 both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since they track different currencies (RUB vs USD), conversion follows the underlying FX rate. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? A7A5 is available on 2 chains and USD0 on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.