BlackRock USD vs United Stables โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days BUIDL supply moved -3.9% and U +10.3% โ U grew faster. BUIDL held the tighter band: worst deviation 0 bps against 10 bps.
| Metric | BUIDL | U |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $2.63B | $1.38B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #9 | #15 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries (BlackRock) | Stablecoin basket |
| Chains deployed | 8 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Solana | BSC |
| Issuer | BlackRock (tokenized by Securitize) | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. BUIDL holds tokenized us treasuries (blackrock); U holds stablecoin basket. BUIDL ranks #9 by USD value and U ranks #15.
BUIDL is larger, with $2.63B in circulation vs $1.38B for U. That's roughly 1.9ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. BUIDL uses a fiat-backed model; U uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. BUIDL and U both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? BUIDL is available on 8 chains and U on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.