Dai vs A7A5 โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Peg history unavailable.
Over the last 30 days DAI supply moved -0.2% and A7A5 +18.8% โ A7A5 grew faster.
| Metric | DAI | A7A5 |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $4.80B | $544.7M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #5 | #19 |
| Peg | USD | RUB |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Overcollateralized crypto CDP | RUB deposits in banks |
| Chains deployed | 49 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Tron |
| Issuer | Sky | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
DAI is USD-pegged and A7A5 tracks RUB, so they serve different currency markets and their market caps are not directly comparable. DAI holds overcollateralized crypto cdp; A7A5 holds rub deposits in banks.
DAI is larger, with $4.80B in circulation vs $544.7M for A7A5. That's roughly 8.8ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. DAI uses a crypto-backed model; A7A5 uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. DAI and A7A5 both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since they track different currencies (USD vs RUB), conversion follows the underlying FX rate. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? DAI is available on 49 chains and A7A5 on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.