Dai vs Open USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Both held within about 3 bps of target across the same window.
| Metric | DAI | OUSD |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $4.80B | $698.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #5 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Overcollateralized crypto CDP | โ |
| Chains deployed | 49 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Tempo |
| Issuer | Sky | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. DAI holds overcollateralized crypto cdp. We track no published reserve breakdown for OUSD. DAI ranks #5 by USD value and OUSD ranks #17.
DAI is larger, with $4.80B in circulation vs $698.8M for OUSD. That's roughly 6.9ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. DAI uses a crypto-backed model; OUSD uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. DAI and OUSD both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? DAI is available on 49 chains and OUSD on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.