GHO vs Usual USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days GHO supply moved +16.7% and USD0 -0.3% โ GHO grew faster. USD0 held the tighter band: worst deviation 18 bps against 26 bps.
| Metric | GHO | USD0 |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $697.5M | $550.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #17 | #19 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Overcollateralized (Aave) | Tokenized US Treasuries (Usual) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Aave | Usual |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. GHO holds overcollateralized (aave); USD0 holds tokenized us treasuries (usual). GHO ranks #17 by USD value and USD0 ranks #19.
GHO is larger, with $697.5M in circulation vs $550.8M for USD0. That's roughly 1.3ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. GHO uses a crypto-backed model; USD0 uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. GHO and USD0 both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? GHO is available on 2 chains and USD0 on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.