GHO vs Solstice USX โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days GHO supply moved +16.7% and USX -2.1% โ GHO grew faster. USX held the tighter band: worst deviation 10 bps against 26 bps.
| Metric | GHO | USX |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $697.5M | $506.6M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #17 | #20 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Overcollateralized (Aave) | Overcollateralized CDP |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 1 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Solana |
| Issuer | Aave | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. GHO holds overcollateralized (aave); USX holds overcollateralized cdp. GHO ranks #17 by USD value and USX ranks #20.
GHO is larger, with $697.5M in circulation vs $506.6M for USX. That's roughly 1.4ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a crypto-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. GHO and USX both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? GHO is available on 2 chains and USX on 1. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.