Ripple USD vs GHO โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days RLUSD supply moved +2.2% and GHO +16.7% โ GHO grew faster. RLUSD held the tighter band: worst deviation 2 bps against 26 bps.
| Metric | RLUSD | GHO |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.58B | $697.5M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #12 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Cash & deposits (Ripple) | Overcollateralized (Aave) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | XRPL | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Ripple | Aave |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. RLUSD holds cash & deposits (ripple); GHO holds overcollateralized (aave). RLUSD ranks #12 by USD value and GHO ranks #17.
RLUSD is larger, with $1.58B in circulation vs $697.5M for GHO. That's roughly 2.3ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. RLUSD uses a fiat-backed model; GHO uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. RLUSD and GHO both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? RLUSD is available on 2 chains and GHO on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.