United Stables vs Open USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
OUSD held the tighter band: worst deviation 3 bps against 9 bps.
| Metric | U | OUSD |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.53B | $698.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #15 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Stablecoin basket | โ |
| Chains deployed | 4 | 4 |
| Primary chain | BSC | Tempo |
| Issuer | United Stables | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. U holds stablecoin basket. We track no published reserve breakdown for OUSD. U ranks #15 by USD value and OUSD ranks #17.
U is larger, with $1.53B in circulation vs $698.8M for OUSD. That's roughly 2.2ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. U uses a crypto-backed model; OUSD uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. U and OUSD both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? U is available on 4 chains and OUSD on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.