United Stables vs YLDS โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days U supply moved +17.4% and YLDS +23.0% โ YLDS grew faster. Both held within about 9 bps of target across the same window.
| Metric | U | YLDS |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.21B | $656.3M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #15 | #18 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Stablecoin basket | Tokenized US Treasuries (SEC registered) |
| Chains deployed | 3 | 4 |
| Primary chain | BSC | Ethereum |
| Issuer | โ | Figure Markets |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. U holds stablecoin basket; YLDS holds tokenized us treasuries (sec registered). U ranks #15 by USD value and YLDS ranks #18.
U is larger, with $1.21B in circulation vs $656.3M for YLDS. That's roughly 1.8ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. U uses a crypto-backed model; YLDS uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. U and YLDS both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? U is available on 3 chains and YLDS on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.