World Liberty Financial USD vs GHO โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USD1 supply moved -10.1% and GHO +16.7% โ GHO grew faster. USD1 held the tighter band: worst deviation 18 bps against 26 bps.
| Metric | USD1 | GHO |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $4.03B | $697.5M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #5 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | US Treasuries | Overcollateralized (Aave) |
| Chains deployed | 8 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Issuer | World Liberty Financial | Aave |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USD1 holds us treasuries; GHO holds overcollateralized (aave). USD1 ranks #5 by USD value and GHO ranks #17.
USD1 is larger, with $4.03B in circulation vs $697.5M for GHO. That's roughly 5.8ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. USD1 uses a fiat-backed model; GHO uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USD1 and GHO both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USD1 is available on 8 chains and GHO on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.