USDD vs GHO โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USDD supply moved +7.9% and GHO +16.7% โ GHO grew faster. GHO held the tighter band: worst deviation 26 bps against 29 bps.
| Metric | USDD | GHO |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.51B | $697.5M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #13 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Algo + TRX collateral | Overcollateralized (Aave) |
| Chains deployed | 4 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Tron | Ethereum |
| Issuer | TRON DAO Reserve | Aave |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDD holds algo + trx collateral; GHO holds overcollateralized (aave). USDD ranks #13 by USD value and GHO ranks #17.
USDD is larger, with $1.51B in circulation vs $697.5M for GHO. That's roughly 2.2ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a crypto-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDD and GHO both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDD is available on 4 chains and GHO on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.