USDD vs Falcon USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USDD supply moved +7.9% and USDf -0.3% โ USDD grew faster. USDD held the tighter band: worst deviation 29 bps against 54 bps.
| Metric | USDD | USDf |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.51B | $1.26B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #13 | #14 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Algo + TRX collateral | Delta-neutral (Falcon) |
| Chains deployed | 4 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Tron | Ethereum |
| Issuer | TRON DAO Reserve | Falcon Finance |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDD holds algo + trx collateral. We track no published reserve breakdown for USDf. USDD ranks #13 by USD value and USDf ranks #14.
USDD is larger, with $1.51B in circulation vs $1.26B for USDf. That's roughly 1.2ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a crypto-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDD and USDf both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDD is available on 4 chains and USDf on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.