USDD vs YLDS โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USDD supply moved +7.9% and YLDS +23.0% โ YLDS grew faster. YLDS held the tighter band: worst deviation 8 bps against 29 bps.
| Metric | USDD | YLDS |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.51B | $656.3M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #13 | #18 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Algo + TRX collateral | Tokenized US Treasuries (SEC registered) |
| Chains deployed | 4 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Tron | Ethereum |
| Issuer | TRON DAO Reserve | Figure Markets |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDD holds algo + trx collateral; YLDS holds tokenized us treasuries (sec registered). USDD ranks #13 by USD value and YLDS ranks #18.
USDD is larger, with $1.51B in circulation vs $656.3M for YLDS. That's roughly 2.3ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. USDD uses a crypto-backed model; YLDS uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDD and YLDS both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDD is available on 4 chains and YLDS on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.