Ethena USDe vs Open USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
OUSD held the tighter band: worst deviation 3 bps against 9 bps.
| Metric | USDe | OUSD |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $4.97B | $698.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #4 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Delta-neutral (ETH/BTC perpetual futures) | โ |
| Chains deployed | 31 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Tempo |
| Issuer | Ethena Labs | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. We track no published reserve breakdown for either coin. USDe ranks #4 by USD value and OUSD ranks #17.
USDe is larger, with $4.97B in circulation vs $698.8M for OUSD. That's roughly 7.1ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. USDe uses a crypto-backed model; OUSD uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDe and OUSD both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDe is available on 31 chains and OUSD on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.