Ethena USDe vs YLDS — side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
| Metric | USDe | YLDS |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $3.94B | $608.2M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #6 | #19 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Delta-neutral (ETH/BTC perpetual futures) | Tokenized US Treasuries (SEC registered) |
| Chains deployed | 31 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Ethena USDe | YLDS |
| CoinGecko | View → | View → |
Both USDe and YLDS track USD, but they differ in backing and issuer. USDe is backed by delta-neutral (eth/btc perpetual futures) while YLDS is backed by tokenized us treasuries (sec registered). As of today, USDe ranks #6 and YLDS ranks #19 among tracked stablecoins.
USDe is larger, with $3.94B in circulation vs $608.2M for YLDS. That's roughly 6.5× the size.
Neither USDe nor YLDS is inherently "safer" — safety depends on the specific backing composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights, and regulatory oversight. USDe uses crypto-backed backing model; YLDS uses fiat-backed. Users should read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDe and YLDS both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDe is available on 31 chains and YLDS on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.