Falcon USD vs GHO — side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USDf supply moved -0.3% and GHO +16.7% — GHO grew faster. GHO held the tighter band: worst deviation 26 bps against 54 bps.
| Metric | USDf | GHO |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.26B | $697.5M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #14 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Delta-neutral (Falcon) | Overcollateralized (Aave) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Falcon Finance | Aave |
| CoinGecko | View → | View → |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. GHO holds overcollateralized (aave). We track no published reserve breakdown for USDf. USDf ranks #14 by USD value and GHO ranks #17.
USDf is larger, with $1.26B in circulation vs $697.5M for GHO. That's roughly 1.8× the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight — none of which this page audits. Both use a crypto-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDf and GHO both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDf is available on 2 chains and GHO on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.