Falcon USD vs United Stables โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USDf supply moved +40.9% and U +19.9% โ USDf grew faster. U held the tighter band: worst deviation 9 bps against 46 bps.
| Metric | USDf | U |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.65B | $1.53B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #13 | #15 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Delta-neutral (Falcon) | Stablecoin basket |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | BSC |
| Issuer | Falcon Finance | United Stables |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. U holds stablecoin basket. We track no published reserve breakdown for USDf. USDf ranks #13 by USD value and U ranks #15.
USDf is larger, with $1.65B in circulation vs $1.53B for U. That's roughly 1.1ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a crypto-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDf and U both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDf is available on 2 chains and U on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.