Falcon USD vs Usual USD — side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Supply moved almost identically over the last 30 days: USDf -0.3%, USD0 -0.3%. USD0 held the tighter band: worst deviation 18 bps against 54 bps.
| Metric | USDf | USD0 |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $1.26B | $550.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #14 | #19 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | crypto-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Delta-neutral (Falcon) | Tokenized US Treasuries (Usual) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Falcon Finance | Usual |
| CoinGecko | View → | View → |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USD0 holds tokenized us treasuries (usual). We track no published reserve breakdown for USDf. USDf ranks #14 by USD value and USD0 ranks #19.
USDf is larger, with $1.26B in circulation vs $550.8M for USD0. That's roughly 2.3× the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight — none of which this page audits. USDf uses a crypto-backed model; USD0 uses a fiat-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDf and USD0 both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDf is available on 2 chains and USD0 on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.