Global Dollar vs Open USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Both held within about 3 bps of target across the same window.
| Metric | USDG | OUSD |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $3.08B | $698.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #7 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Cash reserves (Paxos) | โ |
| Chains deployed | 6 | 4 |
| Primary chain | X Layer | Tempo |
| Issuer | Paxos Trust Company | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDG holds cash reserves (paxos). We track no published reserve breakdown for OUSD. USDG ranks #7 by USD value and OUSD ranks #17.
USDG is larger, with $3.08B in circulation vs $698.8M for OUSD. That's roughly 4.4ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a fiat-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDG and OUSD both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDG is available on 6 chains and OUSD on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.