Global Dollar vs Falcon USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USDG supply moved +17.6% and USDf -0.3% โ USDG grew faster. USDG held the tighter band: worst deviation 33 bps against 54 bps.
| Metric | USDG | USDf |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $3.42B | $1.26B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #7 | #14 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Cash reserves (Paxos) | Delta-neutral (Falcon) |
| Chains deployed | 6 | 2 |
| Primary chain | X Layer | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Paxos Trust Company | Falcon Finance |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDG holds cash reserves (paxos). We track no published reserve breakdown for USDf. USDG ranks #7 by USD value and USDf ranks #14.
USDG is larger, with $3.42B in circulation vs $1.26B for USDf. That's roughly 2.7ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. USDG uses a fiat-backed model; USDf uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDG and USDf both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDG is available on 6 chains and USDf on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.