Tether vs GHO — side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
| Metric | USDT | GHO |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $183.92B | $648.2M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #1 | #18 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Cash & T-bills | Overcollateralized (Aave) |
| Chains deployed | 130 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Tron | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Tether | GHO |
| CoinGecko | View → | View → |
Both USDT and GHO track USD, but they differ in backing and issuer. USDT is backed by cash & t-bills while GHO is backed by overcollateralized (aave). As of today, USDT ranks #1 and GHO ranks #18 among tracked stablecoins.
USDT is larger, with $183.92B in circulation vs $648.2M for GHO. That's roughly 283.7× the size.
Neither USDT nor GHO is inherently "safer" — safety depends on the specific backing composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights, and regulatory oversight. USDT uses fiat-backed backing model; GHO uses crypto-backed. Users should read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDT and GHO both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDT is available on 130 chains and GHO on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.