Ondo US Dollar Yield vs Open USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
OUSD held the tighter band: worst deviation 3 bps against 1494 bps.
| Metric | USDY | OUSD |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $2.21B | $698.8M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #12 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries (Ondo) | โ |
| Chains deployed | 16 | 4 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Tempo |
| Issuer | Ondo Finance | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDY holds tokenized us treasuries (ondo). We track no published reserve breakdown for OUSD. USDY ranks #12 by USD value and OUSD ranks #17.
USDY is larger, with $2.21B in circulation vs $698.8M for OUSD. That's roughly 3.2ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a fiat-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDY and OUSD both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDY is available on 16 chains and OUSD on 4. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.