Ondo US Dollar Yield vs Falcon USD — side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Supply moved almost identically over the last 30 days: USDY -0.9%, USDf -0.3%. USDf held the tighter band: worst deviation 54 bps against 1422 bps.
| Metric | USDY | USDf |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $2.14B | $1.26B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #11 | #14 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries (Ondo) | Delta-neutral (Falcon) |
| Chains deployed | 15 | 2 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Ondo Finance | Falcon Finance |
| CoinGecko | View → | View → |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USDY holds tokenized us treasuries (ondo). We track no published reserve breakdown for USDf. USDY ranks #11 by USD value and USDf ranks #14.
USDY is larger, with $2.14B in circulation vs $1.26B for USDf. That's roughly 1.7× the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight — none of which this page audits. USDY uses a fiat-backed model; USDf uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USDY and USDf both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USDY is available on 15 chains and USDf on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.