Circle USYC vs BlackRock USD โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USYC supply moved -3.6% and BUIDL +13.7% โ BUIDL grew faster. BUIDL held the tighter band: worst deviation 0 bps against 1328 bps.
| Metric | USYC | BUIDL |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $3.00B | $2.71B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #8 | #10 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries | Tokenized US Treasuries (BlackRock) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 8 |
| Primary chain | BSC | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Circle | BlackRock (tokenized by Securitize) |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USYC holds tokenized us treasuries; BUIDL holds tokenized us treasuries (blackrock). USYC ranks #8 by USD value and BUIDL ranks #10.
USYC is larger, with $3.00B in circulation vs $2.71B for BUIDL. That's roughly 1.1ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. Both use a fiat-backed model, so the difference sits in the issuer and the reserves rather than the design. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USYC and BUIDL both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USYC is available on 2 chains and BUIDL on 8. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.