Circle USYC vs GHO โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days USYC supply moved -3.6% and GHO +16.7% โ GHO grew faster. GHO held the tighter band: worst deviation 26 bps against 1328 bps.
| Metric | USYC | GHO |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $3.00B | $697.5M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #8 | #17 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries | Overcollateralized (Aave) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | BSC | Ethereum |
| Issuer | Circle | Aave |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. USYC holds tokenized us treasuries; GHO holds overcollateralized (aave). USYC ranks #8 by USD value and GHO ranks #17.
USYC is larger, with $3.00B in circulation vs $697.5M for GHO. That's roughly 4.3ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. USYC uses a fiat-backed model; GHO uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USYC and GHO both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USYC is available on 2 chains and GHO on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.