Circle USYC vs Ripple USD — side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
| Metric | USYC | RLUSD |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $3.01B | $1.59B |
| Rank (by USD value) | #8 | #12 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | fiat-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries | Cash & deposits (Ripple) |
| Chains deployed | 2 | 2 |
| Primary chain | BSC | XRPL |
| Issuer | Circle USYC | Ripple USD |
| CoinGecko | View → | View → |
Both USYC and RLUSD track USD, but they differ in backing and issuer. USYC is backed by tokenized us treasuries while RLUSD is backed by cash & deposits (ripple). As of today, USYC ranks #8 and RLUSD ranks #12 among tracked stablecoins.
USYC is larger, with $3.01B in circulation vs $1.59B for RLUSD. That's roughly 1.9× the size.
Neither USYC nor RLUSD is inherently "safer" — safety depends on the specific backing composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights, and regulatory oversight. USYC uses fiat-backed backing model; RLUSD uses fiat-backed. Users should read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. USYC and RLUSD both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? USYC is available on 2 chains and RLUSD on 2. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.