YLDS vs Solstice USX โ side-by-side comparison of supply, chains, backing, and peg data.
Over the last 30 days YLDS supply moved +23.0% and USX -2.1% โ YLDS grew faster. YLDS held the tighter band: worst deviation 8 bps against 10 bps.
| Metric | YLDS | USX |
|---|---|---|
| USD circulation value | $656.3M | $506.6M |
| Rank (by USD value) | #18 | #20 |
| Peg | USD | USD |
| Mechanism | fiat-backed | crypto-backed |
| Backing | Tokenized US Treasuries (SEC registered) | Overcollateralized CDP |
| Chains deployed | 4 | 1 |
| Primary chain | Ethereum | Solana |
| Issuer | Figure Markets | โ |
| CoinGecko | View โ | View โ |
Both track USD, so they compete for the same use cases. YLDS holds tokenized us treasuries (sec registered); USX holds overcollateralized cdp. YLDS ranks #18 by USD value and USX ranks #20.
YLDS is larger, with $656.3M in circulation vs $506.6M for USX. That's roughly 1.3ร the size.
Neither is inherently safer. Safety turns on reserve composition, issuer transparency, redemption rights and regulatory oversight โ none of which this page audits. YLDS uses a fiat-backed model; USX uses a crypto-backed one. Read each issuer's most recent reserve attestation before choosing.
Yes. YLDS and USX both trade on major centralized and decentralized exchanges. Since both track USD, the exchange rate is typically very close to 1:1. Direct swap protocols on Ethereum, Solana, and other chains offer the tightest spreads.
The right choice depends on your use case. Consider: which chain do you need? YLDS is available on 4 chains and USX on 1. What backing do you prefer? What's your integration surface (exchanges, DeFi protocols, payment providers)? Both have deep liquidity, so market cap alone shouldn't decide it.